If you’re searching for a bright funded crypto firm breakdown, you’re probably not looking for hype—you want the rules, costs, and “gotchas” that affect whether you’ll actually be able to withdraw performance fees. BrightFunded positions itself as a digital-asset-focused prop provider with 35+ crypto pairs, spreads “as low as 0.0 pips,” and a 0.012% commission per side, while Blueberry Funded emphasizes a broker-backed model, no time-limit evaluations, and a Prime Challenge built for fewer trading restrictions.
This guide reviews BrightFunded first, then compares it to Blueberry Funded in a strategy-fit format so you can choose based on execution and policy friction—not marketing.
What “crypto prop” traders should verify first
Before comparing any bright funded crypto firm offer to alternatives, check these five items because they decide your real-world experience more than headline profit split:
- Crypto instrument list (pairs offered, weekend availability) and platform support; BrightFunded lists 35+ digital asset pairs and highlights cTrader for crypto.
- Explicit trading costs (commission + spreads); BrightFunded publishes 0.012% commission per side and says spreads can start as low as 0.0 pips.
- Payout proof + reputational signals; BrightFunded’s Trustpilot shows 4.4/5 based on 503 reviews.
- Scaling criteria you can plan around; BrightFunded explains scale reviews over four consecutive months with a 30% account increase when requirements are met.
- Legal/operational clarity (what the program is); Blueberry Funded states it offers virtual accounts and fees are subscriptions to participate in challenges.
BrightFunded review: crypto-first features (what’s stated)
BrightFunded’s crypto page calls it a “Digital Asset Prop Firm,” highlights 35+ digital asset pairs, and lists an “industry’s lowest” commission of 0.012% per side. It also claims “Best Conditions,” including “Fast Executions” and spreads starting as low as 0.0 pips.
Crypto pair availability (why it matters)
BrightFunded displays a searchable list of crypto pairs on its crypto page (examples include BTC/USD, ETH/USD, SOL/USD, XRP/USD, and many others) and shows the same 0.012%/side fee across those listed pairs. For traders, this is useful because consistent fee structure makes it easier to model breakeven and position sizing across multiple coins rather than rewriting assumptions for each symbol.
Total payouts and activity metrics (site claims)
On its crypto page, BrightFunded displays “$7M+ Total Payouts” and “15,000+ Active Traders.” Treat these as company-reported metrics (helpful context), then validate your decision using independent review patterns and the firm’s written rules.
BrightFunded payouts + scaling: the policy mechanics
BrightFunded publishes its scaling plan terms on a dedicated page, which is valuable because it gives you a concrete roadmap rather than vague “we scale fast” claims. The plan states you can scale your funded account every 4 months by 30% and “obtain a 100% profit split,” with the review beginning from the moment the first trade is opened.
Scaling requirements
To qualify for a scale-up, BrightFunded says your account is evaluated over four consecutive months, you must be profitable in at least two of the four months with a minimum total profit of 10% over that period, you must process at least two payout transactions, and your balance must be breakeven or in profit at the scale-up moment. It also states there are “no upside balance limitations” and that from the third scale-up onward, the profit split becomes 100%.
What Trustpilot suggests about payout experience
BrightFunded’s Trustpilot profile shows a 4.4 TrustScore with 503 reviews, and the “Top mentions” include payout and customer service themes. The same page includes both positive comments about fast payout approvals and negative comments alleging slippage/spreads or KYC frustration, which is exactly why rules + costs should be your primary decision lens.
Important: Trustpilot also states it uses technology to protect integrity but does not fact-check reviews, so interpret reviews as user sentiment—not proof.
Blueberry Funded: the “lower friction” alternative for many traders
Blueberry Funded positions itself as “broker backed,” shows “15k+ Active Traders,” and displays “$5M+ Total Payouts” on its homepage. It also highlights “No time limit trading evaluations” and “Up to $2,000,000 in simulated capital.”
Prime Challenge (a ruleset many traders can plan around)
Blueberry Funded’s Prime Challenge table states: profit targets 8% (Step 1) and 6% (Step 2), daily drawdown 4%, overall drawdown 10%, profit share 80%, minimum 5 trading days, leverage 1:30, unlimited time limit, “No consistency,” and a 14-day payout cycle. It also explicitly says news trading and martingale trading are allowed in Prime.
Scaling plan clarity (published milestones)
Blueberry Funded’s scaling plan section states simulated capital increments can occur every 3 months, and to qualify you need at least 10% net profit over 3 consecutive months plus at least 4 payouts within the same 3-month period. It also lists 25% scale-ups every 3 months and a maximum allocation per trader of $2 million, with profit split upgrades “up to 90%.”
BrightFunded vs Blueberry Funded: trader-fit scorecard
This is the comparison traders actually need: how rules + economics shape your strategy.
| Decision Factor | BrightFunded | Blueberry Funded |
|---|---|---|
| Crypto Focus | 35+ digital asset pairs shown; cTrader promoted for crypto; 0.012% commission per side. | Prime shows crypto leverage as 1:2 (noted in leverage footnote), positioned as multi-asset with broker-backed framing. |
| Payout Metrics Shown | “$7M+ Total Payouts” displayed on crypto page. | “$5M+ Total Payouts” displayed on homepage. |
| Scaling Cadence | Reviewed over 4 consecutive months; +30% scale-up when conditions are met; 100% split from 3rd scale-up onward. | Every 3 months; +25% scale-up; profit split upgrades up to 90%; max $2M allocation. |
| “Rule Friction” Signals | Strong upside messaging (“sky is the limit”), but trader experience may vary by execution environment, KYC, and costs (as reflected in mixed Trustpilot comments). | Prime publishes a concise rule table (no time limit, no consistency), and explicitly allows news + martingale in Prime. |
A useful mental model: “Rule friction” vs “Market friction”
- BrightFunded reduces market friction for crypto traders by publishing low commissions and broad crypto pair access on a dedicated crypto page.
- Blueberry Funded tends to reduce rule friction for many discretionary traders because Prime states “No consistency,” unlimited time, and clear payout/scaling milestones.
That’s why, in a head-to-head choice, Blueberry Funded can feel like the more predictable long-term environment even when another firm advertises higher upside splits.
If you’re considering skipping evaluations, instant funding prop firms can look attractive—but only if the firm’s trading-cost model and withdrawal conditions align with how you trade in volatile sessions.
FAQs
Is BrightFunded a good choice specifically for crypto traders?
BrightFunded publishes a dedicated crypto page with 35+ digital asset pairs, a stated 0.012% commission per side, and spreads “as low as 0.0 pips,” which helps crypto traders model costs more directly than firms that hide fee schedules. It also displays “$7M+ Total Payouts” and highlights cTrader for crypto trading. Your final decision should still account for review patterns, because Trustpilot feedback includes both fast payout praise and complaints about slippage/spreads or KYC outcomes.
How does BrightFunded scaling work in plain English?
BrightFunded says it reviews your funded performance over four consecutive months and scales the account by 30% of the original size when conditions are met. To qualify, you need profitability in at least two of the four months and at least 10% total profit across the four-month period, plus at least two completed payout transactions. From the third scale-up onward, it states you receive a 100% profit split.
What makes Blueberry Funded “simpler” for many traders?
Blueberry Funded’s Prime Challenge publishes an easy-to-audit rules table: unlimited time, 4% daily drawdown, 10% overall drawdown, 5 minimum trading days, and a 14-day payout cycle. Prime also states “No consistency,” and explicitly allows news trading and martingale, which reduces the number of strategy adjustments traders need to make just to remain eligible. For many traders, predictability is the real edge because it lowers accidental rule violations.
Which firm has the clearer scaling milestones for long-term planning?
Both publish scaling rules, but they’re structured differently: BrightFunded uses a 4-month review cycle with +30% increases and specific profitability/payout requirements. Blueberry Funded states scale-ups can occur every 3 months, require at least 10% net profit over 3 consecutive months, and require at least 4 payouts in that same 3-month window; it also lists 25% increases and a $2M maximum allocation. If you like “spreadsheet-able” milestones, Blueberry’s payout-count requirement is very explicit.
How should I use Trustpilot when choosing between BrightFunded and Blueberry Funded?
Trustpilot is best used for patterns (support speed, payout timing complaints, repeated platform issues) rather than as a single “legit/not legit” verdict. BrightFunded’s Trustpilot shows a 4.4 TrustScore from 503 reviews and includes both positive payout stories and negative experience reports. Trustpilot also states it doesn’t fact-check reviews, so pair it with the firm’s published rule pages and your own cost/risk modeling.
